Over the past few
weeks, due to a variety of reasons – mostly illness, grad school, and grading –
I’ve been unable to keep up with Sons of Anarchy as originally promised. As the weeks wore on, it became harder and
harder to catch up. In order to make up for this, and to save myself a whole
lot of time that I don’t really have to spare, I present to you a review of the
show’s fourth season, albeit two weeks after the fact.
As I’ve said many times since the season premiered back
in September, the fourth season of Sons
of Anarchy was going to be a pivotal one for the show, a time to see if it
could recover from the miscalculation of season three, and more importantly
provide a solid way forward so that the show wouldn’t make a misstep like that
again. Unfortunately, I found that even as the show did succeed on the latter
challenge, it wasn’t as able to accomplish the former.
One of the biggest, and perhaps most important changes
that Kurt Sutter and his writers did this season was to move the show away from
its pulpy, action-oriented storytelling towards a more character-based drama.
Now, there was absolutely nothing wrong with the action-oriented format,
especially as it was presented in the show’s second season, and the fact that
the transition from one tone to another was a bit rough would almost seem to
suggest that the show shouldn’t move in that direction. However, what I think
made this move work more so than it did last season (where there was some sense
of slowing things down) was the focus of the show became tighter, to the extent
that it was in season two. This is a show about one specific motorcycle club,
and the more the show keep that in mind, the better it tends to be.
It’s to that end that I have to criticize the cartel
subplot of the season. Much like how the club’s connection with the Irish gun
smugglers lead to their trip to Ireland in season three, their involvement with
the Galindo cartel has its origins in subplots plots from the third season, so
I can’t pretend that it was an illogical move to make. And yet like the club’s
sudden turn into dealing with the Irish, their sudden deal with the Galindo
cartel, apart from being a positive way to kick off the arc of Clay and Jax’s
attempt to get out of the club, didn’t make a whole lot of sense. This was
mostly due to the fact that the Cartel’s actions were highly marginalized
within the narrative. Every few episodes, they would pop up with some new,
off-screen problem that SAMCRO would suddenly have to deal with in order to
keep receiving the drug money. These events had nothing to do with the club
itself, and thus robbed the show from the character-based drama that I know it
capable of doing and doing well, but even worse it robbed the characters of
their agency. It’s hard to believe that these characters are badasses when
their being led around like a dog on a collar by the cartel.
(The same can be more or less said for the Charming
Heights plots, but there was so little to it that I can’t even come up with
more words than this sentence. But that’s what you get when you relegate
plotlines to the sidelines. It probably could have been scrapped without any
real change to the overall season.)
This ended in the most egregious of these storytelling
snafus, in which it was suddenly revealed at the top of “To Be, Act 2” that the
cartel (or at least the top two officers) were in fact working for the FBI,
having made turncoat to avoid jail time. It was a twist that came out of
nowhere, and thus made little sense. Where was all this talk earlier in the
season? Wouldn’t it have made for better drama to know that the Mexicans were
going to cross the Sons earlier in the season, and thus given their scenes
together an extra layer of tension? Or is that just me? As it stands, that
twist really only seemed to exist because Sutter and his writers ran out of a
way to write out the cartel, and so they went with a simple but unmotivated
twist to close out the storyline. And that bothers me because while this plot
engendered some good stories (more on that later), it didn’t work as a story
itself, and all those scene that didn’t make much sense in the first place now
become even more useless. Even worse, that finale twist seemed to serve as some
sort of narrative justification for Clay to keep on living.
But I have to wonder if Clay really does need to survive. This
season Clay went bad, or at least badder than usual, and while it was
entertaining to watch, it also left Sutter in a difficult position, because
there’s really no going back for Clay, not after he killed Piney and attempted
to have Tara killed to keep the secret of his killing of John, not to mention
how he destroyed the club for his own selfish purposes. For most shows, when a
character goes this far off his original track, it usually means that it’s
about time for him to die, and Clay dying would have been a perfect statement
on the cost of hubris. But instead we have a man, who’s been broken down by his
actions, but he’s completely without recourse, and I see no way the show can
given him an interesting arc off of his current position.
There was a similar parallel to this in Juice’s story
arc, which was one that I actually enjoyed quite a bit. It gave Theo Rossi the
best and largest amount of material to play with, and it actually made me glad
that the show copped out of his suicide by having the branch break, as he got
even better material after the fact. It not only created some excellent
in-group tension and had a character with his back against a metaphorical wall
(the show’s best two veins of drama) but it also revealed to us something new
about the club (vis-à-vis there “no blacks” policy) and even roped in Chibs at
the end. It served as strong evidence for the show’s slide into
less-action-more-emotion mode, and it did it in a way that kept me hooked.
Unfortunately, much like with the cartel, the show
somehow botched the ending when it just sort of ended. Now, there’s still the
possibility that this is a secret that can come up again (something that
happened a couple of times this season, actually), but as of now we just have
Juice deicing that he’s Hispanic dammit, and nobody can tell him otherwise.
There’s something to be said for searches for self-identity, but I don’t think
the show put enough emphasis on this aspect, assuming they were going for that
angle in the first place. As such, it just sort of felt like Sutter chose this
ending to make room for the larger events of the two-part finale.
And that’s to say nothing of Potter and Roosevelt, and
their role in these events. Ray McKinnon and Rockmond Dunbar are fantastic
actors, and they both got their small little moments to shine and define their
characters. But those moments were still small, and I was always left waiting
for the other shoe to drop, for these characters to get a real spotlight and
prove to themselves to be the large threats that the show kept trying to
convince us that they were. I know many people didn’t exactly like her
character – heck, I number among them – but I remember agent Stahl being a
really powerful force against the Sons, and that’s the bar that more or less
been set by the show. Any antagonist that doesn’t clear that bar (or even come
close to it) just won’t feel as threatening, and that leaves the show without the
high stakes that it generally uses to create good drama.
(And let’s going ahead and stick Kozik’s few episodic
appearances in their as well. This season was just a serious misuse of Kenny
Johnson.)
I know that that most of the above makes it sound that
that I’m highly critical of the season, but I didn’t really feel down on the
show when I was watching it week-to-week. Creating a show in which each episode
can hold interest is a difficult task, especially when you’re trying to do a
lot of setup, as Sutter was obviously doing, so I do have to give him credit
for accomplishing that. However, where I think that the season feel apart was
in the way it resolved of all the storylines. I’ve already talked about how the
storylines with Juice and the cartel just sort of ended, and how Clay’s didn’t
seem to get the ending it deserved, but it goes beyond that. For the longest
time this season, I was convinced that these storylines were going to connect
to some of the others, or at least cause a bigger impact, because, hey, that’s
how this show tends to operate. (Hell it’s how most dramas work, and it’s sort of become a de facto rule for televised storytelling.) But instead these
storylines just sort of existed separate from each other, and that feels like a
waster opportunity, especially considering how strong they were
individually.
In the name of ending on a positive note, I would like to
discuss the main arc of the season, which worked extremely well from start to
end, and helped to buoy (or at least distract from) the other, less successful
arcs of the season. The main conflict at
the heart of the season was how/when/if Jax would be able to abdicate his VP
position from the club, which led to the question on the critical end of how
the show would be able to keep Jax in the club long enough to fulfill Sutter’s
seven season goal without making it seem like the show was just throwing
manufacture obstacles at the character or having him run around in circles. In
all honestly this required some contrivance in the early episodes, but as the character
arcs began to rev up, and they began to encircle Jax, the game changed, and the
collusion of arcs led to a far more believable set of event that ended with him
at the head of the club table.
In fact, I’ll say that the ending to “To Be, Act 2” was
one of the strongest moments that the show has produced throughout its entire
run, and it was the reason that I was finally convinced to stick with the show
after two seasons that weren’t as strong as I would have liked. Putting Jax at
the head of the club plays on a lot of what we know both about him and his
father, and that’s highly interesting, but I don’t think it would have worked
had the show not dragged the other characters as well. The fall of Clay and
Gemma (who’s been able to climb back up the ladder somewhat) nicely contrast
the rise of Jax and Tara, though of course “rise” is a relative term. Sure
they’ve gained power, but at the expense of their remaining humanity, and
that’s a great thread for the show to explore next season, to say nothing of
how far off the path Opie has gone.
Tara’s path – especially everything since “Hands”, the
best episode of the season – is the one that most interests me, and the one
that I’m most pleased with. The show has often had a hard time with Tara, both
in keeping her characterization constant, and her exactly role within the
universe of the show. Making her more than just an “old lady” (in the vein of
Gemma) really opens up her character to a much better exploration of how the club
corrupts, and places her in a much more logical proximity to the action. I’ve
always known that Maggie Siff is capable of playing strong yet damaged women,
but I don’t think it was until the finale that the show finally embraced those
two modes at the same time for the character.
But – and I cannot say this enough – a great ending does
not make for a great season. There were a lot of great elements that Sutter was
able to infuse into the show this season, but being unable to make them all
work together was what kept this show at “good” instead of “great”.
No comments:
Post a Comment